Further development

[Claus]

Hi List,

I just wanted to know if some are interested in further developing webcyradm.

As the Company Bitheads now seems to be closed, I am afraid that also
webcyradm will be "lost".

Currently I am using the 0.5.5 mentioned on the download page.

So far web-cyradm has all the features I need.

Is somebody on the list interested in continuing this project? I know there
are some alternatives, but I'd rather stay with webcyradm.

What would be the best starting point for further development? The 0.5.5
version or the last snapshot from svn? Has anybody got a tarball of this?

Some thing I'd like in web-cyradm are:

* Of course bug fixing.
* Implement SSL/TLS connection for the connection to the server (Cyrus/Sieve).
* Better account-navigation for larger sites (Which is in CVS already?)
* In the long term new features might be added, but that is not the priority
at the moment.

Best regards,

Claus

[Richard Pijnenburg]

Hi Claus,

I'm also a web developer and would be interested to work together on the
development of it.
i think there are alot of things that can be improved.

Cheers.

Post by Claus
Hi List,
I just wanted to know if some are interested in further developing webcyradm.
As the Company Bitheads now seems to be closed, I am afraid that also
webcyradm will be "lost".
Currently I am using the 0.5.5 mentioned on the download page.
So far web-cyradm has all the features I need.
Is somebody on the list interested in continuing this project? I know there
are some alternatives, but I'd rather stay with webcyradm.
What would be the best starting point for further development? The 0.5.5
version or the last snapshot from svn? Has anybody got a tarball of this?
* Of course bug fixing.
* Implement SSL/TLS connection for the connection to the server (Cyrus/Sieve).
* Better account-navigation for larger sites (Which is in CVS already?)
* In the long term new features might be added, but that is not the priority
at the moment.
Best regards,
Claus
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

...

[Martynas]

Hi,

It would be great to have developement team. I have also web-cyradm from
the begining, maybe. It is great, because postfix+cyrus is very fast. But
when you look at other web manegement solutions (like postfixadmin:
postfix+courier), everybody wants better than web-cyradm now.

Kind regards,
Martynas Bieliauskas

Post by Richard Pijnenburg
Hi Claus,
I'm also a web developer and would be interested to work together on the
development of it.
i think there are alot of things that can be improved.
Cheers.

Post by Claus
Hi List,
I just wanted to know if some are interested in further developing webcyradm.
As the Company Bitheads now seems to be closed, I am afraid that also
webcyradm will be "lost".
Currently I am using the 0.5.5 mentioned on the download page.
So far web-cyradm has all the features I need.
Is somebody on the list interested in continuing this project? I know there
are some alternatives, but I'd rather stay with webcyradm.
What would be the best starting point for further development? The 0.5.5
version or the last snapshot from svn? Has anybody got a tarball of this?
* Of course bug fixing.
* Implement SSL/TLS connection for the connection to the server (Cyrus/Sieve).
* Better account-navigation for larger sites (Which is in CVS already?)
* In the long term new features might be added, but that is not the priority
at the moment.
Best regards,
Claus
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

...

[Claus]

Hi Martynas,
Hi Richard,

Post by Martynas
It would be great to have developement team. I have also web-cyradm from
the begining, maybe. It is great, because postfix+cyrus is very fast. But
postfix+courier), everybody wants better than web-cyradm now.

The other solutions didn't have a development stop for the last couple of
years.

Does anyone have access to the latest CVS/SVN snapshots of webcyradm? Or is
the trunk version mentioned on the homepage the current?

Maybe there are already some improvements in there?

Regards,

Claus

[Richard Pijnenburg]

Hi Claus,

Post by Claus
Hi Martynas,
Hi Richard,

Post by Martynas
It would be great to have developement team. I have also web-cyradm from
the begining, maybe. It is great, because postfix+cyrus is very fast. But
postfix+courier), everybody wants better than web-cyradm now.

The other solutions didn't have a development stop for the last couple of
years.
Does anyone have access to the latest CVS/SVN snapshots of webcyradm? Or is
the trunk version mentioned on the homepage the current?
Maybe there are already some improvements in there?
Regards,
Claus

...

I don't have access to the repository.
So i think it's best to work from the snapshot that's on the website.

Regards,

Richard

[Martynas]

Hi,

I dont have access also..

br,
Martynas

Post by Richard Pijnenburg
Hi Claus,

Post by Claus
Hi Martynas,
Hi Richard,

Post by Martynas
It would be great to have developement team. I have also web-cyradm

from

Post by Martynas
the begining, maybe. It is great, because postfix+cyrus is very fast.

But

Post by Martynas
postfix+courier), everybody wants better than web-cyradm now.

The other solutions didn't have a development stop for the last couple of
years.
Does anyone have access to the latest CVS/SVN snapshots of webcyradm? Or is
the trunk version mentioned on the homepage the current?
Maybe there are already some improvements in there?
Regards,
Claus

I don't have access to the repository.
So i think it's best to work from the snapshot that's on the website.
Regards,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

...

[c***@qwik.net]

Take a look at xerxes on www.qwik.net or Sourceforge.

Post by Claus
Hi List,
I just wanted to know if some are interested in further developing webcyradm.
As the Company Bitheads now seems to be closed, I am afraid that also
webcyradm will be "lost".
Currently I am using the 0.5.5 mentioned on the download page.
So far web-cyradm has all the features I need.
Is somebody on the list interested in continuing this project? I know there
are some alternatives, but I'd rather stay with webcyradm.
What would be the best starting point for further development? The 0.5.5
version or the last snapshot from svn? Has anybody got a tarball of this?
* Of course bug fixing.
* Implement SSL/TLS connection for the connection to the server (Cyrus/Sieve).
* Better account-navigation for larger sites (Which is in CVS already?)
* In the long term new features might be added, but that is not the priority
at the moment.
Best regards,
Claus
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

...

[Claus]

Hi,

Post by c***@qwik.net
Take a look at xerxes on www.qwik.net or Sourceforge.

I did.

Wasn't there a demo site sometime ago?

When did xerxes split from webcyradm? At which version?

What seems to be missing in xerxes is for instance the ability to restrict an
accounts access on IMAP, POP, SIEVE, SMTPAUTH.

For what I can see now I'd rather stay with webcyradm and have that improved.
Maybe it's just me being too cautious of changing to something completely new.

Whitelisting is (at the moment) not that much needed for me.

Regards,

Claus

[Claus]

Hi List,

so far there are only a few responses.

But I think nevertheless the project should be kept up.

Does anyone have a recent SVN snapshot? The one linked on the downloadpage is
in fact just about the same as the 0.5.5 version.

So version 0.5.5 will be most likely the version we will start with.

I will also check the patches sent to the list if they are still needed.

If someone has a patch or patches, please share them.

Are there any known "serious" bugs in version 0.5.5? I haven't encountered any
by now. Buf reports are also welcome.

Regards,

Claus

[Emmett Culley]

Post by Claus
Hi List,
so far there are only a few responses.
But I think nevertheless the project should be kept up.
Does anyone have a recent SVN snapshot? The one linked on the downloadpage is
in fact just about the same as the 0.5.5 version.
So version 0.5.5 will be most likely the version we will start with.
I will also check the patches sent to the list if they are still needed.
If someone has a patch or patches, please share them.
Are there any known "serious" bugs in version 0.5.5? I haven't encountered any
by now. Buf reports are also welcome.
Regards,
Claus
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

...

I've been using web-cyradm for five or six years and have fixed a couple of bugs. However the version I have is 5.4.rc1 (from the README file). Where can I get 5.5? I'll install it and attempt to help some with further development.

I'll also compare my "fixed" code with the new code and provide information on any changes I made that might need to go into the new base.

Emmett

[Claus]

Hi Emmett,

Post by Emmett Culley
I've been using web-cyradm for five or six years and have fixed a couple of
bugs. However the version I have is 5.4.rc1 (from the README file).
Where can I get 5.5? I'll install it and attempt to help some with
further development.

The README is quite outdated.

When you you look on the web frontend you see the Version at the bottom: "you
are running ...".

Post by Emmett Culley
I'll also compare my "fixed" code with the new code and provide information
on any changes I made that might need to go into the new base.

The 0.5.5 Version can be downloaded from the homepage.

Regards,

Claus

[Angelo]

Hi Claus,

i would help with translations or "test" changes; cause i would love to
keep web-cyradm up2date,
but im not that programmer :)

So let me know if i can help

Cheers
Angelo

Post by Claus
Hi Emmett,

Post by Emmett Culley
I've been using web-cyradm for five or six years and have fixed a couple of
bugs. However the version I have is 5.4.rc1 (from the README file).
Where can I get 5.5? I'll install it and attempt to help some with
further development.

The README is quite outdated.
When you you look on the web frontend you see the Version at the bottom: "you
are running ...".

Post by Emmett Culley
I'll also compare my "fixed" code with the new code and provide information
on any changes I made that might need to go into the new base.

The 0.5.5 Version can be downloaded from the homepage.
Regards,
Claus
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

...

[Emmett Culley]

Post by Claus
Hi Emmett,

Post by Emmett Culley
I've been using web-cyradm for five or six years and have fixed a couple of
bugs. However the version I have is 5.4.rc1 (from the README file).
Where can I get 5.5? I'll install it and attempt to help some with
further development.

The README is quite outdated.
When you you look on the web frontend you see the Version at the bottom: "you
are running ...".

Post by Emmett Culley
I'll also compare my "fixed" code with the new code and provide information
on any changes I made that might need to go into the new base.

The 0.5.5 Version can be downloaded from the homepage.

...

Hi Claus,

I have 0.5.5-Beta1-partial. I will update to 0.5.5 and compare to my code.

Regards,
Emmett

[Claus]

Hi Emmett,

Post by Emmett Culley
I have 0.5.5-Beta1-partial. I will update to 0.5.5 and compare to my code.

The 0.5.5-beta1 sounds good. What I wonder is why does it say partial? Did you
download the 0.5.5 Version from the download Page (which seems to be currently
down)?

Regards,

Claus

[Emmett Culley]

Post by Claus
Hi Emmett,

Post by Emmett Culley
I have 0.5.5-Beta1-partial. I will update to 0.5.5 and compare to my code.

The 0.5.5-beta1 sounds good. What I wonder is why does it say partial? Did you
download the 0.5.5 Version from the download Page (which seems to be currently
down)?
Regards,
Claus
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

I am not sure where I got the code, as it as been a couple of years since I upgraded to this version, then fixed a couple of issues.

It is possible that I put the "partial" in the conf.php file when I changed a few things.

Emmett

[Jérôme Lemaire]

Post by Emmett Culley
I am not sure where I got the code, as it as been a couple of years since I upgraded to this version, then fixed a couple of issues.
It is possible that I put the "partial" in the conf.php file when I changed a few things.
Emmett

Hi,
I also have the 0.5.5-beta1 version that I got from download page. I
kept the archive on my server and it's the same version.

I added to my running web-cyradm a new limit for a domain to separate
maximum alias from maximum mail accounts. For exemple, you can have 20
mail accounts and 100 alias.

I explain how to modify web-cyradm in french here :
http://www.dj-j.net/waka/Linux:Web-Cyradm_Nombre_de_comptes_et_d%27alias

I proposed it on the mailinglist some years ago without answer.

I can help in some development and for hosting.

Regards.
Jérôme Lemaire

[Claus]

Hi Jérôme,

Post by Jérôme Lemaire
I added to my running web-cyradm a new limit for a domain to separate
maximum alias from maximum mail accounts. For exemple, you can have 20
mail accounts and 100 alias.

That might be interesting for others also.

Post by Jérôme Lemaire
http://www.dj-j.net/waka/Linux:Web-Cyradm_Nombre_de_comptes_et_d%27alias

My French is not really good, but the changes aren't too big. So I think this
would for sure be something to include.

Post by Jérôme Lemaire
I can help in some development and for hosting.

Development will be needed for sure and hosting may also be an option.

But for the beginning open bugs in the 0.5.5-beta1 version should be the first
thing we should care about.

Regards,

Claus

[Armando Montiel]

Some news about Luc de Louw & WEB-CyrAdm ?

[Luc de Louw]

Armando,

I'm a bit puzzled?

Thanks,

Luc

Some news about Luc de Louw& WEB-CyrAdm ?
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

[Felix Joussein]

Hi,
I was wondring, if the project is still in development?
The last stable version is from 2006 or so.

regards,
Felix

Post by Luc de Louw
Armando,
I'm a bit puzzled?
Thanks,
Luc

Some news about Luc de Louw& WEB-CyrAdm ?
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

[Gritchin Anton]

Use postfixadmin. Same functionality, and its in development.

Webcyradm was a good tool, but its died few years ago.





From: web-cyradm-***@web-cyradm.org
[mailto:web-cyradm-***@web-cyradm.org] On Behalf Of Felix Joussein
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:58 PM
To: web-***@web-cyradm.org
Subject: Re: [Web-cyradm] Update: Further development



Hi,
I was wondring, if the project is still in development?
The last stable version is from 2006 or so.

[Armando Montiel]

What about an existing database for WEB-CyrAdm?

Is possible the migration or the use of this ?

Post by Gritchin Anton
Use postfixadmin. Same functionality, and its in development.
Webcyradm was a good tool, but its died few years ago.
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:58 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Web-cyradm] Update: Further development
Hi,
I was wondring, if the project is still in development?
The last stable version is from 2006 or so.
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

[Felix Joussein]

So I thought, it's dead!
How ever, I think that this should be mentioned on the project's website.

"This project is no more under development."

Felix

Post by Gritchin Anton
Use postfixadmin. Same functionality, and its in development.
Webcyradm was a good tool, but its died few years ago.
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:58 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Web-cyradm] Update: Further development
Hi,
I was wondring, if the project is still in development?
The last stable version is from 2006 or so.
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm